이거 한문장만 해석해주세요 ㅠㅠ
In North Korea, the scholar-officials went one step further, since they cannot stand the fact that Korea was once unified by a southern kingdom. They extol virtues of Koguryŏ in all possible ways, of course, and also insist that Silla's unification of the 7th century was not a real one, since the new state did not control all of Korea. Hence the real unity was established only in the 10th century, largely thanks to the proud descendants of the great Koguryŏ.
The rationale behind this interpretation is easy to understand, since the borders of Silla are roughly similar to those of present-day South Korea, while Koguryŏ controlled what is now the realm of the Kim dynasty.
This is a retro-projection of the present-day struggle between the North and South, with each participant being firmly associated with some long-extinct state.
저기서 This is a retro-projection of the present-day struggle between the North and South, with each participant being firmly associated with some long-extinct state.
이거 딱 한문장이요.. 해석하기 난감하네요. ㅠㅠ 해석해주시는분들 감사합니다 ㅠㅠ
The rationale behind this interpretation is easy to understand, since the borders of Silla are roughly similar to those of present-day South Korea, while Koguryŏ controlled what is now the realm of the Kim dynasty.
This is a retro-projection of the present-day struggle between the North and South, with each participant being firmly associated with some long-extinct state.
저기서 This is a retro-projection of the present-day struggle between the North and South, with each participant being firmly associated with some long-extinct state.
이거 딱 한문장이요.. 해석하기 난감하네요. ㅠㅠ 해석해주시는분들 감사합니다 ㅠㅠ
0 XDK (+0)
유익한 글을 읽었다면 작성자에게 XDK를 선물하세요.
-
개버릇 남 못준다고 중앙대에서 해왔던 조직적이고 비윤리적 홍보 행위를 왜 한양대에...
이것(앞에 나온 내용)은 옛날에 멸망한 나라(고구려 신라)와 깊게(확고하게?) 관련이 있는 북한과 남한의 현대의 논쟁(다툼)의 투영이다.
번역은 어려워.... 아닌가요?
쉽게 말해 현 남북 대치의 과거판이라는거죠
님이 잘생겼다고 하는거 같은데요.
..ㅋㅋㅋㅋ.ㅋㅋㅋㅋ